Council Post: ​Why Strong Tech Stalls Before Production, And The 7 Buyer Commitments That Prevent It

Masha Khmel turns frontier technology into enterprise revenue. She leads Strategy & Business Operations at Tensordyne.

If you're in deep tech, you might be familiar with this common dilemma: The technology keeps passing evaluations and the pipeline keeps growing, but production revenue never arrives. Nobody can quite explain what's holding things up. Eventually, someone suggests hiring more salespeople.

I have been in that room more than once. On one occasion, a third party had to deliver part of the solution alongside us. The business case held up, the terms were agreed upon and I assumed the hardest part was behind us.

Yet the opportunity still expired. Our delivery date slipped past the customer's deadline, and nothing in our process had required us to track those two dates together in the same document. I had been managing the deal, but I hadn't been managing the chain of dependencies it relied on.

That is something I've seen repeatedly. I've built commercial functions from scratch four times across consulting, last-mile logistics and semiconductors. The same pattern appeared in every one.

When a company buys deep tech, the purchase creates work for them. Something physical must be installed, staffed and integrated into an operating plan written a year ago. Your delivery date becomes a variable in their decision. In software, you lose deals to competitors. In deep tech, you lose them to your own schedule.

So I stopped treating these deals as a funnel and started treating them as a chain of customer commitments. A commitment is not a meeting, a demo or a signature. It is a condition that has become true inside the customer's organization: a named problem, a funded budget line or a person who will be accountable for running the system. You cannot perform these tasks yourself. You can only do the work that brings the customer to each one, in order.

There are seven commitments, and the order has never changed, which is why I trust it.

Seven Commitments Your Buyers Must Make

1. Identify a production problem that already exists.

It has to be a specific job running today, badly or expensively. To know whether it's a real problem, ask whether it was in the buyer's plan before you arrived and whether it gets worse on its own. If you have to teach the customer to care about it, you could spend two years funding an education project without ever getting a production deal.

2. Translate your performance into a unit of value finance already pays for.

Your performance number has to land in a budget line the buyer controls. Until then, you are asking them to invent a category to buy you with.

3. Put your product envelope (including what you will not build) in writing.

Document where the product works reliably and where it does not. The last part is the one that matters. Deep tech companies often die from custom work, and the job is to make each customer need less of it than the one before.

4. Map the whole buying system rather than just champion your solution.

Approval, money, operations and blame sit with four different people, and production money comes from a plan set a year before you arrived. The person who approved the technology might love it, but that doesn't mean they can get the deal across the line.

5. Design a pilot that produces a decision.

The pilot needs agreed validation gates, a timeline and commercial terms for what happens next.

The strongest version I built was a two-phase agreement where the second phase opened only when named gates were met. We agreed on the terms before the first phase began, so passing it triggered the contract rather than another negotiation. Write the failure case too, so the pilot produces a decision either way.

6. Transfer operational deployment to their own team.

The technology needs to handle real work at real volume, with a service level someone owns and a runbook for when things go wrong. There has to be an operator on their side who would notice a problem at 2 a.m. Without that operational ownership, the vendor remains the first call whenever something breaks.

7. Confirm adoption before they chase expansion.

The work routes through the system by default, and the customer team owns the day-to-day operation. The signal I trust is the moment that an outage becomes their operational incident rather than your failed demo. Expansion then requires a separate decision, often from a different person, within a defined planning window. Miss it, and you wait a year.

The Fix: A Staffing Decision

Going back to my deal, the first four commitments were in place, but the fifth was missing. There was no document connecting our readiness to deliver with the customer's deadline. By the time that deadline arrived, the agreement had expired.

This is rarely one person's mistake. Sales, engineering and production can all do their jobs correctly while nobody owns the dependencies between the customer's budget and your roadmap.

That makes the fix a staffing decision. Name one person accountable for the whole chain, and keep them accountable past the signature, until the first independent production cycle or the first repeat order.

Before hiring another seller, take the last five opportunities that fell through and use the checklist above to mark the last commitment each one reached. Most probably will have broken at the same one or two commitments, and that is your answer.

In deep tech, the contract is the midpoint of the sale. The deal moves forward when technical proof, operating ownership and customer economics come together in a single decision.

Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?